《关于对莎士比亚的英文评价（精选两篇）》

关于对莎士比亚的英文评价（精选2篇）

关于对莎士比亚的英文评价 篇1

Shakespeare's death, his theatrical circles of friends to collect his work, in 1623) out of Shakespeare's first plays, 36 script, known as "the first a pair of sale". The dramatist Ben jonson wrote the inscription for it, the Shakespeare puffery, says he is "the soul of the era of", "it does not belong to an era which belongs to all of the century".

Between the 17th and 18th century, due to the rise of classical theory, the Shakespeare's comments are generally balanced, both admitted to Shakespeare's great, and point out his shortcomings.

As Britain's sun, John Shakespeare is a natural poet, he praised his character both universality and individuality. , he thought that Shakespeare sacrifice their virtue, attaches great importance to give the reader a pleasure rather than for readers to teach, writing have no moral purpose; Tragedy is poor, the eloquence and speeches mostly dull, grandiose language and long, do not take the plot arrangement. Classical Sally review in France is the representative of voltaire, he thought that Shakespeare is a great, is dirty, it to Shakespeare's less sure, no more. Starting from the classical elegant interest, he think that Shakespeare rough sneaky and lack of rationality, there is no rule that has no manners, said Shakespeare is a "genius of the barbarians".

关于对莎士比亚的英文评价 篇2

The end of the 18th century in the early 19th century, the romantic trend rise. Romantic Sally review shows two characteristics:

(1) lost the balance of classicism, appreciate Shakespeare blindly, thus forming the worship of Shakespeare.

(2) the emphasis on feelings, emphasizing the enthusiasm, pay attention to the inner world of the characters of Shakespeare.

And the romantic style of Shakespeare's creation as a romantic different, 19 th-century Russia Sally review emphasizes realistic characteristics of Shakespeare. Russian critics such as belinsky, chernyshevsky, dubrovnik luo stay puff, more is for Shakespeare. Tolstoy's Shakespeare is that don't understand, you're welcome. Force against Shakespeare, he think that Shakespeare was not an artist, not creating characters, his work is not art, is he plagiarized, and give the original to completely spoilt